PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQLI.TO achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly lower than HXS.TO's 11.99% return.


EQLI.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
5.38%
YTD
9.23%
6M
8.05%
1Y
19.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HXS.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
7.20%
YTD
11.99%
6M
10.17%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
23.29%
5Y*
16.64%
10Y*
15.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EQLI.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
9.23%6.40%7.18%
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
11.99%11.93%10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EQLI.TO and HXS.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.71

The correlation between EQLI.TO and HXS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQLI.TO
HXS.TO

Technology

18.3%
35.6%

Industrials

14.7%
8.3%

Financial Services

14.4%
11.8%

Healthcare

10.9%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
4.9%

Real Estate

6.2%
1.9%

Utilities

6.1%
2.4%

Energy

4.6%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.1%
1.8%

Communication Services

4.0%
11.2%

Technology

EQLI.TO
18.3%
HXS.TO
35.6%

Industrials

EQLI.TO
14.7%
HXS.TO
8.3%

Financial Services

EQLI.TO
14.4%
HXS.TO
11.8%

Healthcare

EQLI.TO
10.9%
HXS.TO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EQLI.TO
10.3%
HXS.TO
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

EQLI.TO
6.5%
HXS.TO
4.9%

Real Estate

EQLI.TO
6.2%
HXS.TO
1.9%

Utilities

EQLI.TO
6.1%
HXS.TO
2.4%

Energy

EQLI.TO
4.6%
HXS.TO
3.5%

Basic Materials

EQLI.TO
4.1%
HXS.TO
1.8%

Communication Services

EQLI.TO
4.0%
HXS.TO
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQLI.TO
EQLI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EQLI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HXS.TO
HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQLI.TOHXS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.33

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.79

12.62

+1.16

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQLI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQLI.TO and HXS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQLI.TOHXS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.46

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.02

+0.07

Drawdowns

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQLI.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.57%, smaller than the maximum HXS.TO drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQLI.TO and HXS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLI.TOHXS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-27.42%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.45%

-8.74%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-3.54%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

2.30%

-0.89%

Volatility

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) is 1.88%, while Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that EQLI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQLI.TOHXS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

3.27%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.82%

8.83%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

11.85%

-2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

15.13%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.11%

16.53%

-4.42%

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQLI.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than HXS.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQLI.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQLI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, while HXS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
EQLI.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
8.29%8.74%3.00%
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQLI.TO and HXS.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EQLI.TO.

EQLI.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EQLI.TO and 0.10% for HXS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQLI.TO and HXS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer