EQLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO
EQLI.TO (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF) and GOGY.TO (Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - EQLI.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while GOGY.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. EQLI.TO is passively managed, while GOGY.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, EQLI.TO returned 19.34% vs 123.99% for GOGY.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQLI.TO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GOGY.TO.
Performance
EQLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQLI.TO achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly lower than GOGY.TO's 14.33% return.
EQLI.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 123.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EQLI.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 9.23% | 6.47% |
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 14.33% | 80.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQLI.TO and GOGY.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EQLI.TO
GOGY.TO
EQLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) and Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQLI.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.62 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 6.19 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.79 | 22.77 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQLI.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 4.08 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 2.31 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
EQLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQLI.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.57%, smaller than the maximum GOGY.TO drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQLI.TO and GOGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQLI.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -20.87% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | -20.14% | +14.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.57% | +10.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -5.07% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 5.47% | -4.06% |
Volatility
EQLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) is 1.88%, while Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) has a volatility of 9.16%. This indicates that EQLI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQLI.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.88% | 9.16% | -7.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 21.42% | -14.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.08% | 30.67% | -21.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 34.61% | -22.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 34.61% | -22.50% |
EQLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQLI.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GOGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
EQLI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, less than GOGY.TO's 12.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EQLI.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 8.29% | 8.74% | 3.00% |
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 12.78% | 8.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQLI.TO and GOGY.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EQLI.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQLI.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GOGY.TO.
EQLI.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while GOGY.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EQLI.TO and 0.40% for GOGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for EQLI.TO and GOGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer