PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQCL.TO achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than EMAX.TO's 31.32% return.


EQCL.TO

1D
2.42%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
2.69%
1Y
16.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMAX.TO

1D
-1.98%
1M
11.00%
YTD
31.32%
6M
31.82%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQCL.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQCL.TO
EQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EMAX.TO
EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQCL.TOEMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

1.16

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.55

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.54

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.42

4.01

+1.41

EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQCL.TO and EMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQCL.TOEMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.16

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.81

+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between EQCL.TO and EMAX.TO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, more than EMAX.TO's 9.29% yield.


TTM202520242023
EQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD
10.88%11.51%10.96%2.87%
EMAX.TO
Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
9.29%13.44%12.31%0.00%

Drawdowns

EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum EMAX.TO drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCL.TO and EMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQCL.TOEMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-27.55%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.29%

-20.97%

+5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.50%

-3.30%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-9.52%

+7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

8.03%

-4.92%

Volatility

EQCL.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) at 5.45%. This indicates that EQCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQCL.TOEMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

5.45%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

13.03%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

26.34%

-6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

22.14%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

22.14%

-7.09%