PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EQCC.TO
Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
-0.75%13.50%11.68%
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
4.87%9.95%5.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQCC.TO achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than UMAX.TO's 4.87% return.


EQCC.TO

1D
1.83%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
2.42%
1Y
13.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UMAX.TO

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
4.87%
6M
5.47%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EQCC.TO and UMAX.TO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQCC.TO
EQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

UMAX.TO
UMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQCC.TOUMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

1.44

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

2.00

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

1.85

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.29

8.59

-4.30

EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQCC.TO and UMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQCC.TOUMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.44

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.90

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between EQCC.TO and UMAX.TO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, less than UMAX.TO's 13.09% yield.


TTM202520242023
EQCC.TO
Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
8.84%9.43%5.38%0.00%
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
13.09%14.86%14.81%6.96%

Drawdowns

EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, which is greater than UMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCC.TO and UMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQCC.TOUMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-10.09%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-6.23%

-6.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-2.84%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-2.05%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

1.39%

+1.50%

Volatility

EQCC.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) at 2.22%. This indicates that EQCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQCC.TOUMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

2.22%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.68%

4.78%

+2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

7.81%

+8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

8.68%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

8.68%

+4.95%