EQCC.TO vs. GLCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO).
EQCC.TO and GLCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on May 28, 2024. GLCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011.
Performance
EQCC.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQCC.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF | -0.75% | 13.50% | 11.68% |
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 5.98% | 137.43% | 2.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQCC.TO achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than GLCC.TO's 5.98% return.
EQCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLCC.TO
- 1D
- 5.95%
- 1M
- -18.48%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 86.11%
- 3Y*
- 43.56%
- 5Y*
- 25.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQCC.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCC.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EQCC.TO vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EQCC.TO
GLCC.TO
EQCC.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQCC.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 2.10 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 2.39 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 3.04 | -2.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 11.66 | -7.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQCC.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.10 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.00 | +0.98 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQCC.TO and GLCC.TO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EQCC.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
EQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, more than GLCC.TO's 6.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF | 8.84% | 9.43% | 5.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 6.21% | 6.01% | 10.30% | 11.16% | 10.08% | 6.31% | 6.47% | 4.58% | 5.62% | 7.09% | 9.21% | 11.63% |
Drawdowns
EQCC.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCC.TO and GLCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQCC.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -71.12% | +55.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -28.86% | +16.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | -18.48% | +12.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -34.62% | +32.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 7.54% | -4.65% |
Volatility
EQCC.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) is 4.52%, while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a volatility of 17.09%. This indicates that EQCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQCC.TO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 17.09% | -12.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 34.47% | -26.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 41.29% | -25.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 31.17% | -17.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 31.75% | -18.12% |