EQB.TO vs. FCCM.NEO
EQB.TO (Equitable Group Inc.) is a stock, while FCCM.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum Index. Over the past 5 years, EQB.TO returned 13.33%/yr vs 19.08%/yr for FCCM.NEO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EQB.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQB.TO achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly higher than FCCM.NEO's 11.11% return.
EQB.TO
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 14.01%
- 6M
- 21.55%
- 1Y
- 30.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.45%
FCCM.NEO
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 44.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.52%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- —
EQB.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQB.TO Equitable Group Inc. | 14.01% | 7.42% | 15.74% | 57.07% | -15.96% | 37.89% | 41.00% |
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF | 11.11% | 43.17% | 27.03% | 10.10% | -3.42% | 14.23% | 9.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQB.TO and FCCM.NEO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2020 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQB.TO vs. FCCM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
EQB.TO
FCCM.NEO
EQB.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equitable Group Inc. (EQB.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQB.TO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.52 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.59 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | 15.61 | -12.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQB.TO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.85 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 1.42 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.34 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
EQB.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQB.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, which is greater than FCCM.NEO's maximum drawdown of -16.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQB.TO and FCCM.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQB.TO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.62% | -16.59% | -56.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.59% | -12.36% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.94% | -12.36% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.76% | -16.59% | -28.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -1.19% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.38% | -2.60% | -13.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | 2.83% | +6.95% |
Volatility
EQB.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Equitable Group Inc. (EQB.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO) at 5.20%. This indicates that EQB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQB.TO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 5.20% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.44% | 12.63% | +7.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.93% | 15.60% | +11.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.20% | 13.47% | +15.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.53% | 13.41% | +23.12% |
Dividends
EQB.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Dividend Comparison
EQB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than FCCM.NEO's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQB.TO Equitable Group Inc. | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.85% | 1.72% | 2.13% | 1.07% | 1.47% | 1.18% | 1.83% | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.48% |
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF | 0.82% | 0.91% | 0.91% | 1.32% | 1.79% | 1.49% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQB.TO and FCCM.NEO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EQB.TO and FCCM.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer