EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EQAC.MI (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc) and ZPDT.DE (SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQAC.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZPDT.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQAC.MI returned 18.68%/yr vs 22.38%/yr for ZPDT.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQAC.MI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZPDT.DE.

Performance

EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQAC.MI achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly lower than ZPDT.DE's 24.09% return.

EQAC.MI

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 20.38%
• 6M: 19.41%
• 1Y: 37.86%
• 3Y*: 24.54%
• 5Y*: 18.68%
• 10Y*: —

ZPDT.DE

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: 13.81%
• YTD: 24.09%
• 6M: 23.15%
• 1Y: 49.52%
• 3Y*: 26.33%
• 5Y*: 22.38%
• 10Y*: 24.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EQAC.MI Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc	20.38%	6.78%	35.08%	50.29%	-30.28%	40.00%	35.43%	6.99%
ZPDT.DE SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF	24.09%	11.31%	29.30%	52.02%	-25.52%	47.48%	30.46%	9.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAC.MI and ZPDT.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019	0.92

The correlation between EQAC.MI and ZPDT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAC.MI

EQAC.MI Risk / Return Rank: 73
EQAC.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EQAC.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EQAC.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EQAC.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EQAC.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 63

ZPDT.DE

ZPDT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ZPDT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ZPDT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ZPDT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ZPDT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQAC.MI	ZPDT.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.43	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	3.14	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.39	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	3.19	+0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.32	8.35	+2.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAC.MI Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAC.MI and ZPDT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQAC.MI	ZPDT.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.43	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.99	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.03	+0.03

Drawdowns

EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAC.MI drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPDT.DE drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAC.MI and ZPDT.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQAC.MI	ZPDT.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-31.48%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.99%	-15.47%	+5.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.69%	-29.50%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.96%	-29.50%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-3.09%	+2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.27%	-5.68%	-1.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	5.91%	-2.57%

Volatility

EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) is 4.33%, while SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that EQAC.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPDT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQAC.MI	ZPDT.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	7.06%	-2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.80%	14.78%	-3.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	20.30%	-4.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.67%	22.33%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.23%	21.38%	-0.15%

EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQAC.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQAC.MI vs. ZPDT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EQAC.MI nor ZPDT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQAC.MI and ZPDT.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, EQAC.MI and ZPDT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EQAC.MI or ZPDT.DE?

On fees, ZPDT.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQAC.MI or ZPDT.DE?

ZPDT.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQAC.MI.

What is the main difference between EQAC.MI and ZPDT.DE?

EQAC.MI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZPDT.DE is Technology Equities. EQAC.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZPDT.DE tracks S&P Technology Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQAC.MI and 0.15% for ZPDT.DE.