EQAC.MI vs. QDVH.DE
EQAC.MI (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc) and QDVH.DE (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EQAC.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while QDVH.DE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQAC.MI returned 18.68%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for QDVH.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQAC.MI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVH.DE.
Performance
EQAC.MI vs. QDVH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQAC.MI achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than QDVH.DE's -4.21% return.
EQAC.MI
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 8.00%
- YTD
- 20.38%
- 6M
- 18.69%
- 1Y
- 37.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.54%
- 5Y*
- 18.68%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVH.DE
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- 2.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
EQAC.MI vs. QDVH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQAC.MI Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc | 20.38% | 6.78% | 35.08% | 50.29% | -30.28% | 40.00% | 35.43% | 6.99% |
QDVH.DE iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -4.21% | 3.01% | 37.13% | 8.44% | -6.23% | 48.50% | -12.20% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQAC.MI and QDVH.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019 | 0.44 |
The correlation between EQAC.MI and QDVH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQAC.MI vs. QDVH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EQAC.MI
QDVH.DE
EQAC.MI vs. QDVH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQAC.MI | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.03 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 0.14 | +3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 0.33 | +10.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQAC.MI | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 0.13 | +2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.49 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.48 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
EQAC.MI vs. QDVH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQAC.MI drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum QDVH.DE drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAC.MI and QDVH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQAC.MI | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -42.39% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -12.76% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.69% | -21.72% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.96% | -21.72% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -9.46% | +8.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.27% | -7.90% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 5.55% | -2.21% |
Volatility
EQAC.MI vs. QDVH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQAC.MI | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 4.30% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 10.53% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 14.63% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 18.23% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 20.90% | +0.33% |
EQAC.MI vs. QDVH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQAC.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVH.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQAC.MI vs. QDVH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EQAC.MI nor QDVH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EQAC.MI and QDVH.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQAC.MI.
EQAC.MI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QDVH.DE is Financials Equities. EQAC.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QDVH.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQAC.MI and 0.15% for QDVH.DE.
Find the right allocation for EQAC.MI and QDVH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer