EPSV vs. USFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EPSV (Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EPSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. EPSV is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past year, EPSV returned 45.03% vs 3.99% for USFR. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. EPSV charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.

Performance

EPSV vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPSV achieves a 27.95% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.82% return.

EPSV

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: 27.95%
• 6M: 25.89%
• 1Y: 45.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USFR

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 3.99%
• 3Y*: 4.74%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: 2.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPSV vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	27.95%	22.17%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	1.82%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EPSV and USFR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

EPSV vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPSV

EPSV Risk / Return Rank: 86
EPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 88

USFR

USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPSV vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPSV	USFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	14.67	-12.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	50.13	-46.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	13.31	-11.88
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.06	201.33	-196.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.56	779.76	-762.20

EPSV vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPSV Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPSV and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPSV vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPSV drawdown since its inception was -8.93%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSV and USFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPSV	USFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.93%	-1.36%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-0.02%	-8.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	0.00%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-0.15%	-1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	0.01%	+2.56%

Volatility

EPSV vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that EPSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPSV	USFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.60%	0.09%	+5.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.18%	0.19%	+12.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.09%	0.27%	+17.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.24%	0.40%	+17.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.24%	0.78%	+17.46%

EPSV vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPSV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPSV vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

EPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than USFR's 3.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	2.25%	2.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	3.90%	4.15%	5.17%	5.12%	1.78%	0.01%	0.40%	2.08%	1.67%	1.03%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPSV and USFR in my portfolio?

EPSV and USFR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPSV or USFR?

EPSV has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to USFR (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSV dropped -8.93% vs USFR's -1.36%.

Which ETF is better, EPSV or USFR?

On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 45.03% vs 3.99% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPSV or USFR?

Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 45.03% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPSV or USFR?

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPSV or USFR?

USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 2.25% for EPSV.

What is the main difference between EPSV and USFR?

EPSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPSV and 0.15% for USFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.67 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.