EPOL vs. FLEE
EPOL (iShares MSCI Poland ETF) and FLEE (Franklin FTSE Europe ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EPOL tracks the MSCI Poland Investable Market Index while FLEE tracks the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPOL returned 15.78%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for FLEE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPOL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLEE.
Performance
EPOL vs. FLEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than FLEE's 5.58% return.
EPOL
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 6M
- 22.93%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 35.67%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
FLEE
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 17.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- —
EPOL vs. FLEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPOL iShares MSCI Poland ETF | 13.58% | 77.34% | -2.61% | 50.70% | -24.62% | 12.21% | -8.38% | -6.13% | -13.76% | 2.11% |
FLEE Franklin FTSE Europe ETF | 5.58% | 35.76% | 2.03% | 20.46% | -15.22% | 16.84% | 5.33% | 24.41% | -14.97% | 1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPOL and FLEE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EPOL and FLEE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPOL vs. FLEE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPOL
FLEE
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EPOL
FLEE
Energy
EPOL
FLEE
Consumer Cyclical
EPOL
FLEE
Basic Materials
EPOL
FLEE
Communication Services
EPOL
FLEE
Consumer Defensive
EPOL
FLEE
Utilities
EPOL
FLEE
Technology
EPOL
FLEE
Industrials
EPOL
FLEE
Healthcare
EPOL
FLEE
Real Estate
EPOL
-
FLEE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPOL vs. FLEE — Risk / Return Rank
EPOL
FLEE
EPOL vs. FLEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPOL | FLEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 1.40 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 5.13 | +4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPOL | FLEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.11 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
EPOL vs. FLEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than FLEE's maximum drawdown of -37.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and FLEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPOL | FLEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.72% | -37.27% | -26.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | -12.37% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.81% | -14.59% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.21% | -31.62% | -22.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -3.03% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.89% | -7.11% | -19.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 3.38% | +0.65% |
Volatility
EPOL vs. FLEE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) at 5.78%. This indicates that EPOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPOL | FLEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 5.78% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.35% | 12.98% | +4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.20% | 15.59% | +7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 17.37% | +11.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.65% | 18.95% | +8.70% |
EPOL vs. FLEE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPOL vs. FLEE - Dividend Comparison
EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than FLEE's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPOL iShares MSCI Poland ETF | 4.21% | 4.78% | 6.04% | 2.87% | 2.65% | 1.33% | 1.44% | 2.51% | 1.44% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.53% |
FLEE Franklin FTSE Europe ETF | 2.61% | 2.76% | 3.93% | 2.57% | 3.48% | 3.61% | 1.88% | 3.02% | 3.85% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPOL and FLEE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPOL has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to FLEE (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPOL dropped -63.72% vs FLEE's -37.27%.
On 5-year performance, EPOL leads with 15.78% vs 8.65% for FLEE. On fees, FLEE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEE has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EPOL has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.
EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.61% for FLEE.
EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while FLEE tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.09% for FLEE.
EPOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPOL and FLEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer