EPMB vs. PEXL
EPMB (Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. EPMB is actively managed, while PEXL is passively managed. Over the past year, EPMB returned 27.09% vs 45.53% for PEXL. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPMB charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
EPMB vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPMB achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 19.63% return.
EPMB
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 14.90%
- 6M
- 13.66%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEXL
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- 45.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EPMB vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPMB Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF | 14.90% | 15.95% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 19.63% | 35.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPMB and PEXL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EPMB and PEXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPMB vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPMB
PEXL
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
EPMB
PEXL
Technology
EPMB
PEXL
Financial Services
EPMB
PEXL
-
Healthcare
EPMB
PEXL
Consumer Cyclical
EPMB
PEXL
Real Estate
EPMB
PEXL
-
Basic Materials
EPMB
PEXL
Energy
EPMB
PEXL
Communication Services
EPMB
PEXL
Utilities
EPMB
PEXL
-
Consumer Defensive
EPMB
PEXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPMB vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
EPMB
PEXL
EPMB vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF (EPMB) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPMB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 4.00 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.56 | 16.56 | -4.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPMB vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPMB drawdown since its inception was -8.95%, smaller than the maximum PEXL drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPMB and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPMB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -36.76% | +27.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -11.43% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -3.37% | +2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -6.69% | +5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.76% | -0.41% |
Volatility
EPMB vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF (EPMB) is 4.44%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that EPMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPMB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 8.72% | -4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 14.95% | -3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 19.25% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 22.12% | -7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 24.13% | -9.32% |
EPMB vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPMB has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPMB vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
EPMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than PEXL's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPMB Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF | 1.56% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.30% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPMB and PEXL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to EPMB (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPMB dropped -8.95% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
On 1-year performance, PEXL leads with 45.53% vs 27.09% for EPMB. On fees, PEXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EPMB has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 45.53% return vs 27.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMB.
EPMB has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.30% for PEXL.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPMB and 0.60% for PEXL.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPMB and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer