PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPMB vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPMB vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF (EPMB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPMB achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 50.16% return.


EPMB

1D
-1.26%
1M
2.30%
YTD
14.90%
6M
13.66%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
-1.13%
1M
-18.58%
YTD
50.16%
6M
47.74%
1Y
36.30%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
9.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPMB vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EPMB
Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
14.90%15.95%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
50.16%3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EPMB and DBO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPMB vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPMB
EPMB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EPMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EPMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPMB vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF (EPMB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPMBDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.58

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

4.29

+7.27

EPMB vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPMB and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPMB vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPMB drawdown since its inception was -8.95%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPMB and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPMBDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.95%

-90.18%

+81.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-23.03%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-60.48%

+59.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-62.22%

+60.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

8.51%

-6.16%

Volatility

EPMB vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF (EPMB) is 4.44%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that EPMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPMBDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

10.29%

-5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

29.36%

-18.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

34.89%

-20.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

32.54%

-17.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.81%

31.81%

-17.00%

EPMB vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPMB has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPMB vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

EPMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than DBO's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.34%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
EPMB
Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
1.56%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPMB and DBO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to EPMB (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPMB dropped -8.95% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 36.30% vs 27.09% for EPMB. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, EPMB has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 36.30% return vs 27.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMB.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.56% for EPMB.

EPMB is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPMB and 0.78% for DBO.

EPMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPMB and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer