EPAI vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPAI (Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPAI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. EPAI is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPAI charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

EPAI vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPAI achieves a 47.68% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.

EPAI

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 9.43%
• YTD: 47.68%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 32.32%
• YTD: 107.97%
• 6M: 109.04%
• 1Y: 223.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPAI vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF	47.68%	0.86%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.97%	4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EPAI and CHPS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

EPAI vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPAI vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPAI	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.70	1.81	+2.89

Drawdowns

EPAI vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPAI drawdown since its inception was -12.31%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAI and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPAI	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.31%	-39.44%	+27.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-9.16%	+6.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EPAI	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.61%	34.43%	-3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.61%	33.78%	-3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.61%	33.78%	-3.17%

EPAI vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPAI has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPAI vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

EPAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPAI and CHPS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, EPAI and CHPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EPAI or CHPS?

On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPAI or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPAI or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for EPAI.

What is the main difference between EPAI and CHPS?

EPAI is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPAI and 0.15% for CHPS.