EOD vs. HTD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EOD (Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund) and HTD (John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund) are both Dividend funds. Over the past 10 years, EOD returned 11.79%/yr vs 8.34%/yr for HTD. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EOD charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for HTD.

Performance

EOD vs. HTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) and John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOD achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than HTD's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, EOD has outperformed HTD with an annualized return of 11.79%, while HTD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.

EOD

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 5.02%
• YTD: 17.52%
• 6M: 19.34%
• 1Y: 38.38%
• 3Y*: 28.51%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

HTD

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 6M: 8.09%
• 1Y: 18.96%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: 8.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOD vs. HTD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund	17.52%	28.76%	25.83%	9.78%	-17.65%	32.87%	-3.16%	35.96%	-12.05%	20.46%
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund	10.11%	15.87%	25.68%	-9.92%	-6.24%	32.36%	-16.54%	42.77%	-9.13%	16.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EOD and HTD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2007	0.50

The correlation between EOD and HTD shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EOD vs. HTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOD

EOD Risk / Return Rank: 82
EOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EOD Omega Ratio Rank: 74
EOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EOD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

HTD

HTD Risk / Return Rank: 38
HTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
HTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
HTD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
HTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
HTD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOD vs. HTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) and John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EOD	HTD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	1.57	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	2.17	+1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.28	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.01	3.08	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.65	8.61	+13.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EOD vs. HTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the HTD Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOD and HTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EOD	HTD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	1.57	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.46	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.37	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.43	-0.19

Drawdowns

EOD vs. HTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOD drawdown since its inception was -57.02%, smaller than the maximum HTD drawdown of -69.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOD and HTD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EOD	HTD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.02%	-69.79%	+12.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-6.18%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	-20.94%	+5.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.61%	-31.58%	+5.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.08%	-56.57%	+9.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-2.09%	+1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.21%	-8.80%	-4.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	2.21%	-0.43%

Volatility

EOD vs. HTD - Volatility Comparison

Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) at 2.66%. This indicates that EOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EOD	HTD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	2.66%	+1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	8.94%	+3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	12.11%	+2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.54%	17.76%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.10%	22.62%	-3.52%

EOD vs. HTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOD has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than HTD's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EOD vs. HTD - Dividend Comparison

EOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than HTD's 7.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund	7.78%	8.73%	9.16%	9.98%	11.80%	8.76%	11.41%	10.36%	13.84%	10.56%	9.91%	12.16%
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund	7.43%	7.51%	7.52%	8.73%	7.36%	5.80%	7.97%	6.06%	10.09%	8.85%	7.30%	7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EOD and HTD in my portfolio?

EOD and HTD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EOD or HTD?

EOD has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to HTD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOD dropped -57.02% vs HTD's -69.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.