ENVB vs. IBBQ
ENVB (Enveric Biosciences Inc) is a stock, while IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ / Biotechnology. Over the past 3 years, ENVB returned -85.93%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for IBBQ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENVB vs. IBBQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENVB achieves a -45.45% return, which is significantly lower than IBBQ's 1.91% return.
ENVB
- 1D
- -10.81%
- 1M
- -41.94%
- YTD
- -45.45%
- 6M
- -66.44%
- 1Y
- -87.01%
- 3Y*
- -85.93%
- 5Y*
- -84.37%
- 10Y*
- -74.11%
IBBQ
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 39.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENVB vs. IBBQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENVB Enveric Biosciences Inc | -45.45% | -94.37% | -72.43% | -37.50% | -95.53% | -60.92% |
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 1.91% | 33.32% | -0.63% | 4.73% | -10.41% | -6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENVB and IBBQ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENVB vs. IBBQ — Risk / Return Rank
ENVB
IBBQ
ENVB vs. IBBQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) and Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENVB | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.34 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 4.79 | -5.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 15.68 | -17.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENVB | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 2.03 | -2.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 0.16 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
ENVB vs. IBBQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENVB drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than IBBQ's maximum drawdown of -37.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENVB and IBBQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENVB | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -37.94% | -62.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.71% | -8.34% | -81.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.79% | -23.66% | -76.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -5.17% | -94.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.06% | -16.82% | -69.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 64.77% | 2.54% | +62.23% |
Volatility
ENVB vs. IBBQ - Volatility Comparison
Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) has a higher volatility of 22.82% compared to Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) at 6.84%. This indicates that ENVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBBQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENVB | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.82% | 6.84% | +15.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 135.93% | 15.14% | +120.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 174.21% | 19.63% | +154.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 155.99% | 21.86% | +134.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 164.58% | 21.86% | +142.72% |
Dividends
ENVB vs. IBBQ - Dividend Comparison
ENVB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBBQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENVB Enveric Biosciences Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.87% | 0.90% | 1.14% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENVB and IBBQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENVB has higher volatility (22.82%) compared to IBBQ (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENVB dropped -100.00% vs IBBQ's -37.94%.
IBBQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENVB and IBBQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer