ENTR.DE vs. ETLR.DE
ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and ETLR.DE (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while ETLR.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ENTR.DE returned 30.75% vs 35.59% for ETLR.DE. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENTR.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLR.DE.
Performance
ENTR.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENTR.DE achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly lower than ETLR.DE's 18.40% return.
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 30.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLR.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 35.59%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.68% | 11.51% |
ETLR.DE L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 18.40% | 12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENTR.DE and ETLR.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENTR.DE vs. ETLR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ENTR.DE
ETLR.DE
ENTR.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENTR.DE | ETLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 3.40 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 11.06 | -0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENTR.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.89%, smaller than the maximum ETLR.DE drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENTR.DE and ETLR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENTR.DE | ETLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -27.65% | +13.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -10.42% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -2.49% | -5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -5.42% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 3.21% | -0.15% |
Volatility
ENTR.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) is 3.87%, while L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that ENTR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETLR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENTR.DE | ETLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 5.44% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.17% | 15.26% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 18.75% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 16.43% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 16.91% | -0.57% |
ENTR.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENTR.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLR.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENTR.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENTR.DE nor ETLR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENTR.DE and ETLR.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLR.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
ENTR.DE is categorized as Commodities, while ETLR.DE is Japan Equities. ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while ETLR.DE tracks Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ENTR.DE and 0.10% for ETLR.DE.
Find the right allocation for ENTR.DE and ETLR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer