PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENS vs. 051915.KS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENS vs. 051915.KS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EnerSys (ENS) and LG Chem Ltd (051915.KS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENS is traded in USD, while 051915.KS is traded in KRW. To make them comparable, the 051915.KS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENS achieves a 55.77% return, which is significantly higher than 051915.KS's -8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ENS has outperformed 051915.KS with an annualized return of 14.72%, while 051915.KS has yielded a comparatively lower -1.95% annualized return.


ENS

1D
0.23%
1M
6.36%
YTD
55.77%
6M
55.61%
1Y
174.64%
3Y*
30.88%
5Y*
20.56%
10Y*
14.72%

051915.KS

1D
4.54%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
-8.19%
6M
-9.12%
1Y
41.16%
3Y*
-28.57%
5Y*
-18.92%
10Y*
-1.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENS vs. 051915.KS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENS
EnerSys
55.77%60.28%-7.57%37.90%-5.64%-4.04%12.19%-2.57%12.46%-9.97%
051915.KS
LG Chem Ltd
-8.19%7.83%-55.23%10.77%-5.55%-28.59%141.60%-13.66%-22.34%60.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ENS and 051915.KS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2007

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENS vs. 051915.KS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENS
ENS Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ENS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ENS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENS Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

051915.KS
051915.KS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
051915.KS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
051915.KS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
051915.KS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
051915.KS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
051915.KS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENS vs. 051915.KS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EnerSys (ENS) and LG Chem Ltd (051915.KS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENS051915.KSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.17

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.59

1.29

+8.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.35

2.50

+31.86

ENS vs. 051915.KS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENS Sharpe Ratio is 4.76, which is higher than the 051915.KS Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENS and 051915.KS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENS vs. 051915.KS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENS drawdown since its inception was -83.95%, roughly equal to the maximum 051915.KS drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENS and 051915.KS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENS051915.KSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.95%

-83.90%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.32%

-33.06%

+14.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-80.53%

+51.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.77%

-80.53%

+38.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.27%

-83.90%

+27.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.22%

-74.35%

+68.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-32.48%

+14.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

16.88%

-11.77%

Volatility

ENS vs. 051915.KS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EnerSys (ENS) is 15.61%, while LG Chem Ltd (051915.KS) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that ENS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 051915.KS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENS051915.KSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.61%

17.53%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.91%

45.28%

-13.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.97%

56.17%

-19.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.53%

44.71%

-10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.69%

43.17%

-6.48%

Dividends

ENS vs. 051915.KS - Dividend Comparison

ENS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than 051915.KS's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
051915.KS
LG Chem Ltd
1.28%0.63%0.00%1.14%3.62%4.20%2.63%1.18%3.09%2.43%2.81%1.84%
ENS
EnerSys
0.46%0.68%1.01%0.79%0.95%0.89%0.84%0.94%0.90%1.01%0.90%1.25%

Financials

ENS vs. 051915.KS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EnerSys and LG Chem Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ENS values in USD, 051915.KS values in KRW

Frequently Asked Questions


ENS and 051915.KS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENS and 051915.KS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer