ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO
ENS.TO (E Split Corp.) is a stock, while ENCL.TO (Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD) is Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Global X. Over the past year, ENS.TO returned 45.41% vs 55.71% for ENCL.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENS.TO achieves a 31.49% return, which is significantly lower than ENCL.TO's 37.98% return.
ENS.TO
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 31.49%
- 6M
- 29.54%
- 1Y
- 45.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- —
ENCL.TO
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 37.98%
- 6M
- 33.14%
- 1Y
- 55.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ENS.TO E Split Corp. | 31.49% | 20.45% | 32.30% | 6.81% |
ENCL.TO Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD | 37.98% | 14.97% | 20.32% | -3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENS.TO and ENCL.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ENS.TO
ENCL.TO
ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E Split Corp. (ENS.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENS.TO | ENCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.54 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 5.21 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.26 | 18.64 | -6.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENS.TO | ENCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 3.17 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.30 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENS.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.45%, which is greater than ENCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENS.TO and ENCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENS.TO | ENCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.45% | -21.05% | -28.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -10.75% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -1.54% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -3.94% | -5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 3.00% | +0.71% |
Volatility
ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for E Split Corp. (ENS.TO) is 6.61%, while Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that ENS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENS.TO | ENCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 7.34% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 15.68% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 17.73% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 20.15% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.80% | 20.15% | +9.65% |
Dividends
ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
ENS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, less than ENCL.TO's 13.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCL.TO Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD | 13.22% | 17.14% | 18.56% | 4.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENS.TO E Split Corp. | 8.36% | 10.29% | 11.14% | 12.98% | 10.30% | 10.97% | 13.39% | 9.41% | 4.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENS.TO and ENCL.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ENS.TO and ENCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer