PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in E Split Corp. (ENS.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENS.TO achieves a 31.49% return, which is significantly lower than ENCL.TO's 37.98% return.


ENS.TO

1D
1.00%
1M
6.54%
YTD
31.49%
6M
29.54%
1Y
45.41%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
19.79%
10Y*

ENCL.TO

1D
1.03%
1M
3.49%
YTD
37.98%
6M
33.14%
1Y
55.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ENS.TO
E Split Corp.
31.49%20.45%32.30%6.81%
ENCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD
37.98%14.97%20.32%-3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ENS.TO and ENCL.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENS.TO
ENS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ENS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ENS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCL.TO
ENCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E Split Corp. (ENS.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENS.TOENCL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.54

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

5.21

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.26

18.64

-6.38

ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENS.TO and ENCL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENS.TOENCL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

3.17

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.30

-0.79

Drawdowns

ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENS.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.45%, which is greater than ENCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENS.TO and ENCL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENS.TOENCL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.45%

-21.05%

-28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-10.75%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.54%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-3.94%

-5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

3.00%

+0.71%

Volatility

ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for E Split Corp. (ENS.TO) is 6.61%, while Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that ENS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENS.TOENCL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

7.34%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

15.68%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

17.73%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.56%

20.15%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.80%

20.15%

+9.65%

Dividends

ENS.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

ENS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, less than ENCL.TO's 13.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ENCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD
13.22%17.14%18.56%4.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ENS.TO
E Split Corp.
8.36%10.29%11.14%12.98%10.30%10.97%13.39%9.41%4.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENS.TO and ENCL.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENS.TO and ENCL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer