ENLT vs. RUP.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) and Rupert Resources Ltd (RUP.TO).

Performance

ENLT vs. RUP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) and Rupert Resources Ltd (RUP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ENLT vs. RUP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ENLT Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares	50.15%	163.61%	-9.90%	7.83%
RUP.TO Rupert Resources Ltd	-1.74%	60.04%	0.41%	-19.73%

Different Trading Currencies

ENLT is traded in USD, while RUP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RUP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ENLT : $9.72B RUP.TO : CA$1.51B
EPS ENLT : $1.21 RUP.TO : -CA$0.04
PB Ratio ENLT : 1.84 RUP.TO : 5.47
Total Revenue (TTM) ENLT : $766.35M RUP.TO : CA$0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) ENLT : $417.07M RUP.TO : -CA$749.30K
EBITDA (TTM) ENLT : $715.90M RUP.TO : -CA$9.27M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENLT achieves a 50.15% return, which is significantly higher than RUP.TO's -1.74% return.

ENLT

• 1D: 6.21%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 50.15%
• 6M: 119.06%
• 1Y: 322.40%
• 3Y*: 59.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RUP.TO

• 1D: 4.66%
• 1M: -21.41%
• YTD: -1.74%
• 6M: 12.95%
• 1Y: 61.86%
• 3Y*: 12.76%
• 5Y*: 7.78%
• 10Y*: 32.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ENLT vs. RUP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENLT

ENLT Risk / Return Rank: 99
ENLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
ENLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ENLT Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ENLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
ENLT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

RUP.TO

RUP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
RUP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RUP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
RUP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RUP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RUP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENLT vs. RUP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) and Rupert Resources Ltd (RUP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENLT	RUP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	6.52	1.23	+5.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.31	1.81	+3.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.22	+0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	18.61	2.18	+16.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	67.28	5.59	+61.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENLT vs. RUP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENLT Sharpe Ratio is 6.52, which is higher than the RUP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENLT and RUP.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENLT	RUP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.52	1.23	+5.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.23	+1.03

Correlation

The correlation between ENLT and RUP.TO is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ENLT vs. RUP.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENLT nor RUP.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ENLT vs. RUP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENLT drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum RUP.TO drawdown of -96.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENLT and RUP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENLT	RUP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.32%	-98.66%	+59.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.98%	-26.77%	+8.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-58.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.89%	-19.93%	+7.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.35%	-56.72%	+44.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.97%	10.47%	-5.50%

Volatility

ENLT vs. RUP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) has a higher volatility of 20.71% compared to Rupert Resources Ltd (RUP.TO) at 16.35%. This indicates that ENLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENLT	RUP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.71%	16.35%	+4.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.05%	38.14%	+1.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.88%	50.65%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.21%	47.79%	-4.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.21%	62.63%	-19.42%

Financials