PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENGY.L is traded in EUR, while WDEE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WDEE.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENGY.L achieves a 36.00% return, which is significantly higher than WDEE.L's 32.52% return.


ENGY.L

1D
1.97%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
36.00%
6M
32.37%
1Y
53.57%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
20.20%
10Y*
11.49%

WDEE.L

1D
2.22%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
32.52%
6M
30.27%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ENGY.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
36.00%14.96%-5.53%4.41%
WDEE.L
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc
32.52%-3.93%10.89%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ENGY.L and WDEE.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.77

The correlation between ENGY.L and WDEE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENGY.L
ENGY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

WDEE.L
WDEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENGY.LWDEE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

3.06

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

9.56

+5.02

ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENGY.L and WDEE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENGY.LWDEE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.85

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.70

-0.28

Drawdowns

ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENGY.L drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, which is greater than WDEE.L's maximum drawdown of -24.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGY.L and WDEE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENGY.LWDEE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

-24.08%

-34.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-11.96%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.50%

-24.08%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-4.27%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.00%

-7.31%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.83%

-0.17%

Volatility

ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) at 7.37%. This indicates that ENGY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENGY.LWDEE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.12%

7.37%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.19%

16.09%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

19.80%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.63%

19.95%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.02%

19.95%

+10.07%

ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ENGY.L and WDEE.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ENGY.L vs. WDEE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENGY.L nor WDEE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ENGY.L and WDEE.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENGY.L and WDEE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

ENGY.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENGY.L and WDEE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer