PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENCO.L achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS.L's 10.20% return.


ENCO.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.46%
6M
15.07%
YTD
20.05%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
10Y*

SPXS.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.05%
6M
9.96%
YTD
10.20%
1Y
-98.78%
3Y*
-74.11%
5Y*
-54.94%
10Y*
-27.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ENCO.L
L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.05%8.38%3.59%-2.45%23.37%9.08%
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.20%-98.82%25.56%27.00%-18.53%9.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ENCO.L and SPXS.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.15

The correlation between ENCO.L and SPXS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENCO.L
ENCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ENCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS.L
SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENCO.LSPXS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.52

+0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

-1.00

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.40

-1.23

+7.63

ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENCO.L and SPXS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENCO.L drawdown since its inception was -23.99%, smaller than the maximum SPXS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCO.L and SPXS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENCO.LSPXS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.99%

-99.07%

+75.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.95%

-99.07%

+86.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-99.07%

+86.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-98.90%

+91.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-7.67%

-4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

80.57%

-76.71%

Volatility

ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that ENCO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENCO.LSPXS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

2.73%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

9.24%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

99.43%

-84.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

47.13%

-29.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

35.27%

-18.04%

ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENCO.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENCO.L vs. SPXS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENCO.L nor SPXS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ENCO.L and SPXS.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENCO.L.

ENCO.L is categorized as Commodities, while SPXS.L is Global Equities. ENCO.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped Total Return Index, while SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ENCO.L and 0.05% for SPXS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENCO.L and SPXS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer