ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ENCO.L (L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and FLXK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENCO.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped Total Return Index, while FLXK.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENCO.L returned 9.97%/yr vs 39.45%/yr for FLXK.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENCO.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLXK.L.

Performance

ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENCO.L achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 75.46% return.

ENCO.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 15.07%
• YTD: 20.05%
• 1Y: 24.71%
• 3Y*: 9.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLXK.L

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -19.56%
• 6M: 57.13%
• YTD: 75.46%
• 1Y: 141.50%
• 3Y*: 39.45%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ENCO.L L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	20.05%	8.38%	3.59%	-2.45%	23.37%	9.08%
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF	75.46%	94.79%	-21.63%	20.77%	-28.01%	-10.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ENCO.L and FLXK.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021	0.20

The correlation between ENCO.L and FLXK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENCO.L

ENCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
ENCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ENCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ENCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
ENCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

FLXK.L

FLXK.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FLXK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FLXK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FLXK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FLXK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENCO.L	FLXK.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	3.14	-1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.28	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.47	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	5.86	-3.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	18.40	-12.00

ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENCO.L and FLXK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENCO.L drawdown since its inception was -23.99%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -49.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCO.L and FLXK.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENCO.L	FLXK.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.99%	-49.43%	+25.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.95%	-24.10%	+11.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.95%	-28.54%	+15.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.40%	-24.10%	+16.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.40%	-20.23%	+7.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	7.70%	-3.84%

Volatility

ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) is 4.29%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 19.75%. This indicates that ENCO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENCO.L	FLXK.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	19.75%	-15.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	41.53%	-28.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.35%	45.08%	-29.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	29.63%	-12.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	29.61%	-12.38%

ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENCO.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENCO.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENCO.L nor FLXK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENCO.L and FLXK.L in my portfolio?

ENCO.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENCO.L or FLXK.L?

On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENCO.L or FLXK.L?

FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENCO.L.

What is the main difference between ENCO.L and FLXK.L?

ENCO.L is categorized as Commodities, while FLXK.L is Global Equities. ENCO.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped Total Return Index, while FLXK.L tracks Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ENCO.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.