PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENCO.L vs. FLES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENCO.L vs. FLES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENCO.L is traded in USD, while FLES.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENCO.L achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly higher than FLES.L's -1.49% return.


ENCO.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.46%
6M
15.07%
YTD
20.05%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
10Y*

FLES.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.93%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-1.49%
1Y
0.66%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENCO.L vs. FLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ENCO.L
L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.05%8.38%3.59%-2.45%23.37%9.08%
FLES.L
Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF
-1.49%16.13%-2.23%6.56%-5.88%-3.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ENCO.L and FLES.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.10

The correlation between ENCO.L and FLES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENCO.L vs. FLES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENCO.L
ENCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ENCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FLES.L
FLES.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENCO.L vs. FLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENCO.LFLES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.02

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

0.13

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.40

0.28

+6.13

ENCO.L vs. FLES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the FLES.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENCO.L and FLES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENCO.L vs. FLES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENCO.L drawdown since its inception was -23.99%, which is greater than FLES.L's maximum drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCO.L and FLES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENCO.LFLES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.99%

-22.21%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.95%

-5.08%

-7.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-7.56%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-3.98%

-3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-6.60%

-5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

2.39%

+1.47%

Volatility

ENCO.L vs. FLES.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L) at 1.61%. This indicates that ENCO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENCO.LFLES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

1.61%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

4.56%

+8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

6.22%

+9.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

7.64%

+9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

7.25%

+9.98%

Dividends

ENCO.L vs. FLES.L - Dividend Comparison

ENCO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ENCO.L
L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLES.L
Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF
1.92%2.62%2.55%1.20%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENCO.L and FLES.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENCO.L is categorized as Commodities, while FLES.L is Global Equities. ENCO.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped Total Return Index, while FLES.L tracks Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Franklin.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENCO.L and FLES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer