ENCL.TO vs. UTES

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ENCL.TO (Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENCL.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ENCL.TO returned 46.09% vs 11.96% for UTES. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENCL.TO charges 1.86%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.

Performance

ENCL.TO vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ENCL.TO is traded in CAD, while UTES is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UTES values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENCL.TO achieves a 35.36% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 2.29% return.

ENCL.TO

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 35.36%
• 6M: 33.47%
• 1Y: 46.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UTES

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 11.96%
• 3Y*: 23.83%
• 5Y*: 18.70%
• 10Y*: 13.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENCL.TO vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ENCL.TO Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD	35.36%	14.97%	20.32%	-11.68%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	2.29%	19.97%	57.66%	6.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ENCL.TO and UTES is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023	0.21

The correlation between ENCL.TO and UTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ENCL.TO vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ENCL.TO	UTES
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	100.0%

Return for Risk

ENCL.TO vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENCL.TO

ENCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 87
ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ENCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ENCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ENCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ENCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

UTES

UTES Risk / Return Rank: 16
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 15
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENCL.TO vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENCL.TO	UTES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	0.50	+2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	0.82	+2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.10	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	0.66	+3.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.78	1.43	+14.35

ENCL.TO vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENCL.TO and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ENCL.TO vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.05%, smaller than the maximum UTES drawdown of -29.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCL.TO and UTES.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENCL.TO	UTES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.05%	-29.41%	+8.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.75%	-16.37%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.41%	-9.57%	+6.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.78%	-5.70%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	7.53%	-4.48%

Volatility

ENCL.TO vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) have volatilities of 7.14% and 7.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENCL.TO	UTES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.14%	7.30%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	17.23%	-1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	21.70%	-3.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.88%	21.51%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.88%	21.15%	-0.27%

ENCL.TO vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENCL.TO has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENCL.TO vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

ENCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.48%, more than UTES's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENCL.TO Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD	13.48%	17.14%	18.56%	4.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	1.49%	1.42%	1.51%	2.44%	2.13%	1.94%	2.09%	1.84%	2.09%	3.44%	3.53%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENCL.TO and UTES in my portfolio?

ENCL.TO and UTES have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENCL.TO or UTES?

On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENCL.TO or UTES?

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.86% for ENCL.TO.

What is the main difference between ENCL.TO and UTES?

ENCL.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.86% for ENCL.TO and 0.49% for UTES.