ENCC.TO vs. IDVO
ENCC.TO (Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF) and IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENCC.TO returned 22.25%/yr vs 23.81%/yr for IDVO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENCC.TO charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IDVO.
Performance
ENCC.TO vs. IDVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENCC.TO is traded in CAD, while IDVO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDVO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENCC.TO achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than IDVO's 13.53% return.
ENCC.TO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 25.62%
- 1Y
- 40.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 25.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
IDVO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENCC.TO vs. IDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 28.21% | 13.13% | 17.39% | 5.72% | 3.12% |
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 13.53% | 30.23% | 19.49% | 14.73% | 8.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENCC.TO and IDVO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ENCC.TO and IDVO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ENCC.TO vs. IDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENCC.TO
IDVO
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
ENCC.TO
IDVO
Basic Materials
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
Communication Services
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
Consumer Cyclical
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
Consumer Defensive
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
Financial Services
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
Healthcare
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
Industrials
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
Real Estate
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
-
Technology
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
Utilities
ENCC.TO
-
IDVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENCC.TO vs. IDVO — Risk / Return Rank
ENCC.TO
IDVO
ENCC.TO vs. IDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENCC.TO | IDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | 3.41 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.17 | 13.33 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENCC.TO | IDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 2.11 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 1.36 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
ENCC.TO vs. IDVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.29%, which is greater than IDVO's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCC.TO and IDVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENCC.TO | IDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.29% | -15.97% | -77.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -10.14% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.67% | -15.97% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.19% | -2.78% | -23.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.08% | -1.89% | -54.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 2.59% | -0.20% |
Volatility
ENCC.TO vs. IDVO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) have volatilities of 5.46% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENCC.TO | IDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 5.59% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 14.04% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.20% | 16.41% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.09% | 17.37% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 17.37% | +11.69% |
ENCC.TO vs. IDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENCC.TO has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IDVO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENCC.TO vs. IDVO - Dividend Comparison
ENCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.16%, more than IDVO's 5.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 11.16% | 13.62% | 14.58% | 14.87% | 12.55% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 6.11% | 8.37% | 6.93% | 4.34% | 3.03% |
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.61% | 5.42% | 6.14% | 5.72% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENCC.TO and IDVO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ENCC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ENCC.TO and 0.65% for IDVO.
Find the right allocation for ENCC.TO and IDVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer