EN.PA vs. CS.PA
EN.PA (Bouygues SA) and CS.PA (AXA SA) are both stocks. EN.PA operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while CS.PA operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, EN.PA returned 10.96%/yr vs 12.05%/yr for CS.PA. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EN.PA vs. CS.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EN.PA achieves a 16.60% return, which is significantly higher than CS.PA's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EN.PA has underperformed CS.PA with an annualized return of 10.96%, while CS.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 12.05% annualized return.
EN.PA
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 16.60%
- 6M
- 20.13%
- 1Y
- 34.95%
- 3Y*
- 23.63%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
CS.PA
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- -1.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.05%
EN.PA vs. CS.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EN.PA Bouygues SA | 16.60% | 63.79% | -11.77% | 28.77% | -5.69% | -1.78% | -6.45% | 27.02% | -24.60% | 32.65% |
CS.PA AXA SA | 1.00% | 25.73% | 23.53% | 20.27% | 6.13% | 42.64% | -19.23% | 41.12% | -19.51% | 7.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between EN.PA and CS.PA is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 1991 | 0.50 |
The correlation between EN.PA and CS.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EN.PA vs. CS.PA — Risk / Return Rank
EN.PA
CS.PA
EN.PA vs. CS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bouygues SA (EN.PA) and AXA SA (CS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EN.PA | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.00 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | -0.13 | +3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | -0.22 | +9.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EN.PA | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | -0.09 | +1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.84 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.28 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
EN.PA vs. CS.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EN.PA drawdown since its inception was -81.68%, roughly equal to the maximum CS.PA drawdown of -82.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EN.PA and CS.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EN.PA | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.68% | -82.46% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.45% | -13.69% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.98% | -13.69% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.21% | -24.39% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.57% | -51.00% | +6.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | -4.68% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -23.76% | -8.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 7.99% | -4.33% |
Volatility
EN.PA vs. CS.PA - Volatility Comparison
Bouygues SA (EN.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to AXA SA (CS.PA) at 6.35%. This indicates that EN.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EN.PA | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 6.35% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 13.87% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.40% | 19.93% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 21.25% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 24.92% | +0.46% |
Dividends
EN.PA vs. CS.PA - Dividend Comparison
EN.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than CS.PA's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS.PA AXA SA | 5.94% | 5.25% | 5.77% | 5.76% | 5.91% | 5.46% | 3.74% | 5.34% | 6.68% | 4.69% | 4.59% | 3.77% |
EN.PA Bouygues SA | 4.23% | 4.51% | 6.66% | 5.28% | 6.42% | 5.40% | 5.05% | 4.49% | 5.42% | 3.69% | 4.70% | 4.38% |
Financials
EN.PA vs. CS.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bouygues SA and AXA SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EN.PA and CS.PA have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EN.PA and CS.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer