PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXC vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 32.33% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 11.45% return.


EMXC

1D
2.43%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
32.33%
6M
36.39%
1Y
62.72%
3Y*
25.41%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*

VBR

1D
0.16%
1M
0.48%
YTD
11.45%
6M
12.14%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
32.33%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.01%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
11.45%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and VBR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017

0.59

The correlation between EMXC and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXC vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMXC
VBR

Technology

45.0%
10.6%

Financial Services

19.6%
17.6%

Industrials

8.3%
18.1%

Basic Materials

6.8%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
12.4%

Energy

4.2%
5.2%

Communication Services

3.4%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.0%

Utilities

2.3%
4.8%

Healthcare

2.2%
7.9%

Real Estate

1.0%
10.1%

Technology

EMXC
45.0%
VBR
10.6%

Financial Services

EMXC
19.6%
VBR
17.6%

Industrials

EMXC
8.3%
VBR
18.1%

Basic Materials

EMXC
6.8%
VBR
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EMXC
4.5%
VBR
12.4%

Energy

EMXC
4.2%
VBR
5.2%

Communication Services

EMXC
3.4%
VBR
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

EMXC
2.9%
VBR
4.0%

Utilities

EMXC
2.3%
VBR
4.8%

Healthcare

EMXC
2.2%
VBR
7.9%

Real Estate

EMXC
1.0%
VBR
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXC vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMXCVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.29

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

2.82

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.27

9.94

+7.33

EMXC vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMXCVBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

1.65

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.40

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.42

+0.08

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXCVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-61.98%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

-8.85%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

-24.19%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

-24.19%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-0.95%

-6.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-8.26%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

2.51%

+1.13%

Volatility

EMXC vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.67%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXCVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.57%

3.67%

+8.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.20%

10.49%

+10.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.27%

15.16%

+8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

19.77%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

21.74%

-1.75%

EMXC vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMXC vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than VBR's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.13%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.76%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMXC and VBR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to VBR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 11.46% vs 7.78% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 11.46% return vs 7.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.76% for VBR.

EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.05% for VBR.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer