EMXC vs. SPYX
EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 12.14%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for SPYX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPYX.
Performance
EMXC vs. SPYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 37.25% return, which is significantly higher than SPYX's 8.26% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 37.25%
- 6M
- 42.23%
- 1Y
- 67.80%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 24.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
EMXC vs. SPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 37.25% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.16% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 8.26% | 17.87% | 25.46% | 26.38% | -19.59% | 28.06% | 19.87% | 31.62% | -4.26% | 8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and SPYX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EMXC and SPYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMXC vs. SPYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXC
SPYX
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
EMXC
SPYX
Financial Services
EMXC
SPYX
Industrials
EMXC
SPYX
Basic Materials
EMXC
SPYX
Consumer Cyclical
EMXC
SPYX
Energy
EMXC
SPYX
Communication Services
EMXC
SPYX
Consumer Defensive
EMXC
SPYX
Utilities
EMXC
SPYX
Healthcare
EMXC
SPYX
Real Estate
EMXC
SPYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. SPYX — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
SPYX
EMXC vs. SPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMXC | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | 2.40 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.51 | 10.78 | +6.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. SPYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than SPYX's maximum drawdown of -32.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and SPYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -32.84% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -9.84% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -18.74% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | -26.14% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -2.38% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -4.53% | -5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 2.19% | +1.55% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. SPYX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) at 4.52%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.83% | 4.52% | +8.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.90% | 9.92% | +11.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 12.61% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 17.12% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 18.04% | +2.03% |
EMXC vs. SPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXC vs. SPYX - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than SPYX's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.05% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 0.86% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC and SPYX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to SPYX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs SPYX's -32.84%.
On 5-year performance, SPYX leads with 12.96% vs 12.14% for EMXC. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 12.96% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.86% for SPYX.
EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPYX is S&P 500. EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.20% for SPYX.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXC and SPYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer