EMXC vs. IVV
EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 12.76%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for IVV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
EMXC vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 41.72% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 12.61%
- YTD
- 41.72%
- 6M
- 46.94%
- 1Y
- 77.94%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
EMXC vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 41.72% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.01% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and IVV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EMXC and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMXC vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXC
IVV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
EMXC
IVV
Financial Services
EMXC
IVV
Industrials
EMXC
IVV
Basic Materials
EMXC
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
EMXC
IVV
Energy
EMXC
IVV
Communication Services
EMXC
IVV
Consumer Defensive
EMXC
IVV
Utilities
EMXC
IVV
Healthcare
EMXC
IVV
Real Estate
EMXC
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
IVV
EMXC vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.43 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | 3.17 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.99 | 14.71 | +7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61 | 2.39 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.45 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -55.25% | +12.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -8.89% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -18.75% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | -24.53% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.76% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -10.78% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.91% | +1.65% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 2.87% | +7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 8.90% | +10.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 11.80% | +9.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 16.88% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 18.05% | +1.77% |
EMXC vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXC vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 1.99% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC and IVV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.88% vs 12.76% for EMXC. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.88% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.
EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.03% for IVV.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXC and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer