EMXC vs. EMFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX).
EMXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Jul 19, 2017. EMFIX is managed by Ashmore. It was launched on Jun 20, 2011.
Performance
EMXC vs. EMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMXC vs. EMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 8.23% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.01% |
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.96% | 35.16% | 7.08% | 9.68% | -26.09% | 4.05% | 30.00% | 30.47% | -16.96% | 11.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than EMFIX's 1.96% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- 4.13%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- —
EMFIX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -11.78%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 35.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMXC vs. EMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EMFIX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. EMFIX — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
EMFIX
EMXC vs. EMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC | EMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 1.84 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 2.43 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.34 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 2.34 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 9.00 | +4.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC | EMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.84 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.20 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.25 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and EMFIX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMXC vs. EMFIX - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than EMFIX's 1.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.60% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% |
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.62% | 1.65% | 0.61% | 1.25% | 0.82% | 22.32% | 2.32% | 2.16% | 0.82% | 2.12% | 1.00% |
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. EMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, roughly equal to the maximum EMFIX drawdown of -44.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and EMFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | EMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -44.99% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -13.50% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | -42.41% | +13.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.88% | -13.20% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.35% | -17.11% | +6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.51% | -0.11% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. EMFIX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 11.89% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) at 7.69%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | EMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.89% | 7.69% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.14% | 12.91% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.58% | 18.81% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 18.51% | -1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 19.49% | +0.02% |