PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXC vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 28.12% return, which is significantly higher than BITI's 25.22% return.


EMXC

1D
0.49%
1M
-4.55%
6M
15.83%
YTD
28.12%
1Y
51.73%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.40%

BITI

1D
-1.48%
1M
-4.03%
6M
13.09%
YTD
25.22%
1Y
56.28%
3Y*
-32.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-35.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.18M$25.87M$38.72M
$255.60M$267.52M$279.80M

EMXC vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
28.12%35.14%2.68%18.96%-0.22%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
25.22%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and BITI is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.34

The correlation between EMXC and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (1 year) to -0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXC vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMXC vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMXCBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.24

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.91

5.45

+4.46

EMXC vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXCBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-92.16%

+49.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-25.28%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

-84.63%

+65.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.07%

-86.33%

+73.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-68.61%

+58.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

10.37%

-5.14%

Volatility

EMXC vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 10.77% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 8.93%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXCBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.77%

8.93%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.82%

33.35%

-7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.64%

44.25%

-16.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

52.01%

-32.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

52.01%

-31.51%

EMXC vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMXC vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than BITI's 21.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
21.80%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.08%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMXC and BITI have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (10.77%) compared to BITI (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, EMXC leads with 23.89% vs -32.35% for BITI. On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 23.89% return vs -32.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 21.80%, compared with 2.08% for EMXC.

EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 1.03% for BITI.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer