PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EMUX.DE) and iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMUX.DE achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than EXS2.DE's 15.70% return.


EMUX.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
4.72%
YTD
8.53%
6M
10.52%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*

EXS2.DE

1D
0.52%
1M
10.51%
YTD
15.70%
6M
16.91%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMUX.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF
8.53%24.11%9.25%18.05%-12.61%22.90%-0.87%27.26%-13.48%13.46%
EXS2.DE
iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE)
15.70%5.33%1.63%13.54%-26.00%21.07%6.12%22.25%-3.77%39.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EMUX.DE and EXS2.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016

0.76

The correlation between EMUX.DE and EXS2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMUX.DE
EMUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EMUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EMUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

EXS2.DE
EXS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EXS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EXS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EMUX.DE) and iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMUX.DEEXS2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.07

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

0.40

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

0.80

+5.43

EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMUX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the EXS2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMUX.DE and EXS2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMUX.DEEXS2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

0.36

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.20

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.14

+0.47

Drawdowns

EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum EXS2.DE drawdown of -84.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMUX.DE and EXS2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMUX.DEEXS2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-84.49%

+46.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-16.12%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

-17.93%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-34.97%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.81%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-39.46%

+34.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

8.07%

-5.25%

Volatility

EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EMUX.DE) is 4.57%, while iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS2.DE) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that EMUX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXS2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMUX.DEEXS2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

5.29%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.92%

14.25%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

17.83%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

18.80%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

19.47%

-2.88%

EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMUX.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EXS2.DE's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMUX.DE vs. EXS2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMUX.DE nor EXS2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMUX.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXS2.DE
iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.15%0.25%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMUX.DE and EXS2.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMUX.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMUX.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EXS2.DE.

EMUX.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE, while EXS2.DE tracks TecDAX®. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMUX.DE and 0.51% for EXS2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMUX.DE and EXS2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer