EMUX.DE vs. CEMS.DE
EMUX.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and CEMS.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EMUX.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE while CEMS.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMUX.DE returned 10.17%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for CEMS.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMUX.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CEMS.DE.
Performance
EMUX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMUX.DE achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 13.72% return.
EMUX.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMS.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 16.86%
- 1Y
- 33.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
EMUX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMUX.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.53% | 24.11% | 9.25% | 18.05% | -12.61% | 22.90% | -0.87% | 27.26% | -13.48% | 13.46% |
CEMS.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 13.72% | 35.97% | 9.93% | 13.90% | -4.54% | 26.62% | -8.86% | 23.48% | -14.04% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMUX.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between EMUX.DE and CEMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMUX.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMUX.DE
CEMS.DE
EMUX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EMUX.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMUX.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 3.29 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 12.37 | -6.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMUX.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 2.37 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.94 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.49 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
EMUX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, roughly equal to the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMUX.DE and CEMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMUX.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -40.20% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -9.99% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | -17.57% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -19.55% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -1.26% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -7.49% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.66% | +0.16% |
Volatility
EMUX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EMUX.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMUX.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.65% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | 11.17% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 13.87% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 15.23% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 17.43% | -0.84% |
EMUX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMUX.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMUX.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMUX.DE nor CEMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, EMUX.DE and CEMS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EMUX.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMUX.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMS.DE.
EMUX.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Filtered Min TE, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMUX.DE and 0.25% for CEMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMUX.DE and CEMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer