EMUS.L vs. CNYB.L
EMUS.L (L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CNYB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMUS.L tracks the J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index while CNYB.L tracks the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMUS.L returned 1.05%/yr vs 3.11%/yr for CNYB.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
EMUS.L vs. CNYB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMUS.L is traded in USD, while CNYB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CNYB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMUS.L achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than CNYB.L's 5.03% return.
EMUS.L
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 2.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- —
CNYB.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- —
EMUS.L vs. CNYB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMUS.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -1.60% | 8.01% | 5.52% | 7.02% | -11.63% | 0.86% |
CNYB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.03% | 5.18% | 4.87% | 0.97% | -5.14% | 7.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMUS.L and CNYB.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMUS.L vs. CNYB.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMUS.L
CNYB.L
EMUS.L vs. CNYB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMUS.L) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CNYB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMUS.L | CNYB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.25 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 5.64 | -5.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 16.08 | -14.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMUS.L vs. CNYB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMUS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, smaller than the maximum CNYB.L drawdown of -24.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMUS.L and CNYB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMUS.L | CNYB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.58% | -24.43% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.59% | -1.30% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.59% | -3.73% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.58% | -11.92% | -7.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -5.07% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -13.91% | +8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 0.46% | +1.28% |
Volatility
EMUS.L vs. CNYB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMUS.L) is 0.89%, while iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CNYB.L) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that EMUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMUS.L | CNYB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 1.27% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.46% | 4.27% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56% | 5.17% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.30% | 6.79% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 12.07% | -6.78% |
EMUS.L vs. CNYB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMUS.L and CNYB.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
EMUS.L vs. CNYB.L - Dividend Comparison
EMUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than CNYB.L's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.72% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 2.55% | 2.72% | 2.74% | 2.65% | 0.72% |
EMUS.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.79% | 5.39% | 4.96% | 4.62% | 3.79% | 1.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMUS.L and CNYB.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMUS.L and CNYB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
EMUS.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index, while CNYB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares.
Find the right allocation for EMUS.L and CNYB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer