EMUG.L vs. 0FLE.L
EMUG.L (L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and 0FLE.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - EMUG.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index, while 0FLE.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note<5 Years Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMUG.L returned 0.93%/yr vs 2.27%/yr for 0FLE.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMUG.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for 0FLE.L.
Performance
EMUG.L vs. 0FLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMUG.L is traded in GBp, while 0FLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0FLE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMUG.L achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than 0FLE.L's -1.10% return.
EMUG.L
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- 6M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
0FLE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- 0.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.27%
- 10Y*
- —
EMUG.L vs. 0FLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMUG.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -4.61% | 1.10% | 7.35% | 1.04% | -0.88% | -25.37% |
0FLE.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | -1.10% | 8.18% | 0.12% | 2.12% | 4.65% | -5.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMUG.L and 0FLE.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMUG.L vs. 0FLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMUG.L
0FLE.L
EMUG.L vs. 0FLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMUG.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMUG.L | 0FLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 0.24 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 0.56 | -0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMUG.L vs. 0FLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMUG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.45%, which is greater than 0FLE.L's maximum drawdown of -13.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMUG.L and 0FLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMUG.L | 0FLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.45% | -13.35% | -17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -2.19% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.64% | -5.02% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.29% | -5.66% | -5.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.67% | -2.19% | -20.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.29% | -5.98% | -18.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 0.93% | +2.39% |
Volatility
EMUG.L vs. 0FLE.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMUG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L) at 1.97%. This indicates that EMUG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0FLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMUG.L | 0FLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 1.97% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.25% | 3.31% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.94% | 4.57% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.08% | 6.55% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 7.07% | +6.86% |
EMUG.L vs. 0FLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMUG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than 0FLE.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMUG.L vs. 0FLE.L - Dividend Comparison
EMUG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than 0FLE.L's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0FLE.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | 4.69% | 5.04% | 6.01% | 5.52% | 1.49% | 0.58% | 1.60% | 2.96% | 2.07% | 0.36% |
EMUG.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.27% | 5.99% | 4.86% | 4.67% | 3.61% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMUG.L and 0FLE.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 0FLE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
0FLE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EMUG.L.
EMUG.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while 0FLE.L is Ultrashort Bond. EMUG.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index, while 0FLE.L tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note<5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EMUG.L and 0.12% for 0FLE.L.
Find the right allocation for EMUG.L and 0FLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer