PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMUD.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares (FEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMUD.L is traded in GBP, while FEUD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FEUD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMUD.L achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than FEUD.L's 12.54% return.


EMUD.L

1D
0.35%
1M
2.34%
YTD
7.97%
6M
8.86%
1Y
17.03%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*

FEUD.L

1D
0.31%
1M
0.70%
YTD
12.54%
6M
15.33%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
22.60%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMUD.L
iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
7.97%24.33%2.24%12.63%-10.09%11.93%5.31%9.38%
FEUD.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares
12.54%47.89%4.04%10.07%-9.74%13.79%0.98%9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EMUD.L and FEUD.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.77

The correlation between EMUD.L and FEUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMUD.L
FEUD.L

Financial Services

24.6%
10.6%

Industrials

20.5%
27.4%

Technology

17.0%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
9.2%

Utilities

6.7%
8.3%

Healthcare

5.7%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
5.3%

Communication Services

5.2%
3.7%

Energy

3.2%
10.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
7.5%

Real Estate

1.5%
6.0%

Financial Services

EMUD.L
24.6%
FEUD.L
10.6%

Industrials

EMUD.L
20.5%
FEUD.L
27.4%

Technology

EMUD.L
17.0%
FEUD.L
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EMUD.L
6.9%
FEUD.L
9.2%

Utilities

EMUD.L
6.7%
FEUD.L
8.3%

Healthcare

EMUD.L
5.7%
FEUD.L
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

EMUD.L
5.6%
FEUD.L
5.3%

Communication Services

EMUD.L
5.2%
FEUD.L
3.7%

Energy

EMUD.L
3.2%
FEUD.L
10.8%

Basic Materials

EMUD.L
2.2%
FEUD.L
7.5%

Real Estate

EMUD.L
1.5%
FEUD.L
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMUD.L
EMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FEUD.L
FEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMUD.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares (FEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMUD.LFEUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.47

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.56

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

12.70

-7.53

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMUD.L and FEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMUD.LFEUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.60

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.79

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.56

-0.10

Drawdowns

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMUD.L drawdown since its inception was -30.22%, smaller than the maximum FEUD.L drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMUD.L and FEUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMUD.LFEUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.22%

-34.17%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-10.60%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.57%

-14.03%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-23.21%

-1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.04%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-6.69%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

2.85%

+0.48%

Volatility

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMUD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares (FEUD.L) at 3.98%. This indicates that EMUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMUD.LFEUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

3.98%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

11.63%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

14.52%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

17.64%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

19.89%

-1.88%

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMUD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FEUD.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMUD.L vs. FEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

EMUD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMUD.L
iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEUD.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares
2.76%3.05%3.72%2.76%2.50%1.94%1.01%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMUD.L and FEUD.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMUD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMUD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEUD.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EMUD.L and 0.75% for FEUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMUD.L and FEUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer