EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L
EMSM.L (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF) and JRDM.L (JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMSM.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SMID NR USD while JRDM.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMSM.L returned 30.63% vs 59.59% for JRDM.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMSM.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JRDM.L.
Performance
EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMSM.L is traded in GBP, while JRDM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMSM.L achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly lower than JRDM.L's 29.14% return.
EMSM.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- 1Y
- 30.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
JRDM.L
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 29.14%
- 6M
- 31.37%
- 1Y
- 59.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMSM.L SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF | 15.33% | 12.15% | 4.60% | 7.17% |
JRDM.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 29.14% | 25.58% | 12.44% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMSM.L and JRDM.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, EMSM.L and JRDM.L have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.
EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Technology
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Industrials
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Financial Services
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Consumer Cyclical
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Basic Materials
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Healthcare
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Real Estate
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Consumer Defensive
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Communication Services
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Utilities
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Energy
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMSM.L
JRDM.L
EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMSM.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.70 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 6.35 | -3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 21.50 | -11.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMSM.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 3.84 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 2.20 | -1.75 |
Drawdowns
EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMSM.L drawdown since its inception was -37.81%, which is greater than JRDM.L's maximum drawdown of -14.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSM.L and JRDM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMSM.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.81% | -14.88% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -10.47% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | -2.35% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -2.43% | -5.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.99% | -0.06% |
Volatility
EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.L) is 6.16%, while JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that EMSM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMSM.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 7.59% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 14.42% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 17.35% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 19.73% | -5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 19.73% | -3.35% |
EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMSM.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JRDM.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMSM.L vs. JRDM.L - Dividend Comparison
EMSM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMSM.L SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JRDM.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 1.48% | 1.94% | 2.24% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMSM.L and JRDM.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JRDM.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JRDM.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMSM.L.
EMSM.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SMID NR USD, while JRDM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMSM.L and 0.30% for JRDM.L.
Find the right allocation for EMSM.L and JRDM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer