EMSF vs. INDE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMSF (Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF) and INDE (Matthews India Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMSF is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Matthews, while INDE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EMSF returned 58.48% vs -0.24% for INDE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

EMSF vs. INDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and Matthews India Active ETF (INDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMSF achieves a 45.49% return, which is significantly higher than INDE's -4.05% return.

EMSF

• 1D: -6.10%
• 1M: 5.39%
• YTD: 45.49%
• 6M: 45.93%
• 1Y: 58.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INDE

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: -4.05%
• 6M: -5.69%
• 1Y: -0.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMSF vs. INDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF	45.49%	19.20%	-3.09%	0.98%
INDE Matthews India Active ETF	-4.05%	2.39%	10.95%	7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EMSF and INDE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.47

Return for Risk

EMSF vs. INDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMSF

EMSF Risk / Return Rank: 71
EMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
EMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

INDE

INDE Risk / Return Rank: 9
INDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
INDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
INDE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
INDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
INDE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMSF vs. INDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and Matthews India Active ETF (INDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMSF	INDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	-0.01	+2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	0.11	+2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.01	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	-0.01	+4.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.14	-0.03	+13.18

EMSF vs. INDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMSF Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the INDE Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMSF and INDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMSF vs. INDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSF drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than INDE's maximum drawdown of -22.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSF and INDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMSF	INDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-22.89%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.57%	-19.10%	+4.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.10%	-11.14%	+5.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-7.62%	+1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	7.40%	-2.94%

Volatility

EMSF vs. INDE - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) has a higher volatility of 14.20% compared to Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) at 5.98%. This indicates that EMSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMSF	INDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.20%	5.98%	+8.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.49%	14.87%	+9.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.21%	17.15%	+11.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.87%	16.62%	+7.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.87%	16.62%	+7.25%

EMSF vs. INDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMSF and INDE have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

EMSF vs. INDE - Dividend Comparison

EMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than INDE's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF	1.29%	1.88%	3.29%	0.02%
INDE Matthews India Active ETF	1.83%	1.75%	0.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMSF and INDE in my portfolio?

EMSF and INDE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMSF or INDE?

EMSF has higher volatility (14.20%) compared to INDE (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMSF dropped -24.75% vs INDE's -22.89%.

Which ETF is better, EMSF or INDE?

On 1-year performance, EMSF leads with 58.48% vs -0.24% for INDE. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, INDE has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMSF or INDE?

Over the 1-year period, EMSF has performed better with a 58.48% return vs -0.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMSF or INDE?

EMSF and INDE have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMSF or INDE?

INDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.29% for EMSF.

What is the main difference between EMSF and INDE?

EMSF is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while INDE is Asia Pacific Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.