EMSF vs. INDE
EMSF (Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF) and INDE (Matthews India Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMSF is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Matthews, while INDE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EMSF returned 63.33% vs -5.01% for INDE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
EMSF vs. INDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMSF achieves a 45.34% return, which is significantly higher than INDE's -8.87% return.
EMSF
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 45.34%
- 6M
- 40.08%
- 1Y
- 63.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INDE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 6M
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- -5.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMSF vs. INDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF | 45.34% | 19.20% | -3.09% | 1.88% |
INDE Matthews India Active ETF | -8.87% | 2.39% | 10.95% | 8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMSF and INDE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023 | 0.45 |
EMSF vs. INDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMSF
INDE
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
EMSF
INDE
Financial Services
EMSF
INDE
Industrials
EMSF
INDE
Consumer Cyclical
EMSF
INDE
Healthcare
EMSF
INDE
Consumer Defensive
EMSF
INDE
Utilities
EMSF
INDE
-
Communication Services
EMSF
INDE
Real Estate
EMSF
INDE
-
Basic Materials
EMSF
-
INDE
Energy
EMSF
-
INDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMSF vs. INDE — Risk / Return Rank
EMSF
INDE
EMSF vs. INDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and Matthews India Active ETF (INDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMSF | INDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | -0.30 | +2.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.14 | -0.33 | +3.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.96 | +0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | -0.26 | +4.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | -0.71 | +15.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMSF | INDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | -0.30 | +2.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.26 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
EMSF vs. INDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMSF drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than INDE's maximum drawdown of -22.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSF and INDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMSF | INDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -22.89% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.57% | -19.10% | +4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -15.61% | +14.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -7.52% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 7.13% | -2.78% |
Volatility
EMSF vs. INDE - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) at 6.75%. This indicates that EMSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMSF | INDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.96% | 6.75% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.98% | 14.33% | +7.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.35% | 16.62% | +8.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 16.51% | +6.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 16.51% | +6.24% |
EMSF vs. INDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMSF and INDE have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
EMSF vs. INDE - Dividend Comparison
EMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than INDE's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF | 1.30% | 1.88% | 3.29% | 0.02% |
INDE Matthews India Active ETF | 1.93% | 1.75% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMSF and INDE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMSF has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to INDE (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMSF dropped -24.75% vs INDE's -22.89%.
On 1-year performance, EMSF leads with 63.33% vs -5.01% for INDE. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, INDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EMSF has performed better with a 63.33% return vs -5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMSF and INDE have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
INDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.30% for EMSF.
EMSF is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while INDE is Asia Pacific Equities.
EMSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMSF and INDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer