PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMSF vs. AVEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMSF vs. AVEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMSF vs. AVEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMSF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
10.93%19.20%-3.09%3.47%
AVEE
Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF
2.78%19.80%2.91%7.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMSF achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than AVEE's 2.78% return.


EMSF

1D
1.27%
1M
-6.57%
YTD
10.93%
6M
8.16%
1Y
32.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVEE

1D
1.07%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
2.78%
6M
1.05%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMSF vs. AVEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMSF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEE's 0.42% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMSF vs. AVEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMSF
EMSF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEE
AVEE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AVEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMSF vs. AVEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMSFAVEEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

1.88

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.06

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.48

7.31

+0.16

EMSF vs. AVEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the AVEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMSF and AVEE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMSFAVEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.86

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between EMSF and AVEE is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EMSF vs. AVEE - Dividend Comparison

EMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than AVEE's 2.25% yield.


Drawdowns

EMSF vs. AVEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSF drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than AVEE's maximum drawdown of -20.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSF and AVEE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMSFAVEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-20.21%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.57%

-12.14%

-2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.70%

-7.32%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-3.78%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

3.41%

+0.93%

Volatility

EMSF vs. AVEE - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) has a higher volatility of 11.37% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE) at 7.59%. This indicates that EMSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMSFAVEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.37%

7.59%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.44%

11.96%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.57%

17.26%

+7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

16.02%

+5.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

16.02%

+5.76%