EMRD.L vs. XDEX.L
EMRD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDEX.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMRD.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index while XDEX.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMRD.L returned 8.95%/yr vs 12.54%/yr for XDEX.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
EMRD.L vs. XDEX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMRD.L is traded in USD, while XDEX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMRD.L achieves a 18.51% return, which is significantly lower than XDEX.L's 30.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EMRD.L has underperformed XDEX.L with an annualized return of 8.95%, while XDEX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.54% annualized return.
EMRD.L
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 35.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
XDEX.L
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- 6M
- 23.87%
- YTD
- 30.59%
- 1Y
- 54.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
EMRD.L vs. XDEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMRD.L State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.51% | 34.18% | 7.65% | 9.74% | -20.67% | -2.26% | 17.96% | 17.38% | -14.07% | 36.47% |
XDEX.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 30.59% | 37.83% | 1.15% | 8.32% | -19.84% | 18.99% | 16.36% | 26.83% | -10.00% | 25.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMRD.L and XDEX.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EMRD.L and XDEX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (10 years) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMRD.L vs. XDEX.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMRD.L
XDEX.L
EMRD.L vs. XDEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMRD.L | XDEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 3.60 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | 12.16 | -3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMRD.L vs. XDEX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMRD.L drawdown since its inception was -39.82%, which is greater than XDEX.L's maximum drawdown of -32.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRD.L and XDEX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMRD.L | XDEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.82% | -32.75% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -14.99% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -19.39% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.03% | -30.61% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | -32.75% | -7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.35% | -10.66% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.50% | -6.96% | -7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 4.44% | -0.39% |
Volatility
EMRD.L vs. XDEX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) is 9.23%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that EMRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMRD.L | XDEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 11.15% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.85% | 21.82% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.97% | 23.62% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 18.64% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.29% | +2.36% |
EMRD.L vs. XDEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMRD.L and XDEX.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMRD.L vs. XDEX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMRD.L nor XDEX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EMRD.L and XDEX.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMRD.L and XDEX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
EMRD.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while XDEX.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for EMRD.L and XDEX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer