EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EMRD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CAPU.L (Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EMRD.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while CAPU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMRD.L returned 8.78%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for CAPU.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMRD.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CAPU.L.

Performance

EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EMRD.L is traded in USD, while CAPU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CAPU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMRD.L achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly higher than CAPU.L's 4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EMRD.L has underperformed CAPU.L with an annualized return of 8.78%, while CAPU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.

EMRD.L

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -9.43%
• 6M: 10.42%
• YTD: 16.13%
• 1Y: 31.48%
• 3Y*: 19.48%
• 5Y*: 6.42%
• 10Y*: 8.78%

CAPU.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 4.02%
• 6M: 3.77%
• YTD: 4.37%
• 1Y: 9.64%
• 3Y*: 11.81%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: 13.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMRD.L State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	16.13%	34.18%	7.65%	9.74%	-20.67%	-2.26%	17.96%	17.38%	-14.07%	36.47%
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust	4.37%	9.41%	15.93%	28.24%	-15.37%	28.44%	17.74%	31.11%	-5.04%	20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EMRD.L and CAPU.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2015	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between EMRD.L and CAPU.L has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMRD.L

EMRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
EMRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EMRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
EMRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EMRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EMRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

CAPU.L

CAPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CAPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CAPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CAPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CAPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMRD.L	CAPU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	0.95	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	1.41	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.16	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	1.05	+1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.64	3.04	+4.60

EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMRD.L and CAPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMRD.L drawdown since its inception was -39.82%, smaller than the maximum CAPU.L drawdown of -42.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRD.L and CAPU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMRD.L	CAPU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.82%	-42.99%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-9.12%	-3.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	-19.13%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.96%	-21.13%	-13.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.82%	-34.23%	-5.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.18%	-0.09%	-11.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.50%	-11.11%	-3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	3.16%	+0.95%

Volatility

EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) at 2.03%. This indicates that EMRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMRD.L	CAPU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.25%	2.03%	+7.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.93%	7.92%	+12.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.07%	10.17%	+11.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.32%	20.51%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.66%	21.80%	-2.14%

EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMRD.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMRD.L vs. CAPU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMRD.L nor CAPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMRD.L and CAPU.L in my portfolio?

EMRD.L and CAPU.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMRD.L or CAPU.L?

On fees, EMRD.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMRD.L or CAPU.L?

EMRD.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.

What is the main difference between EMRD.L and CAPU.L?

EMRD.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CAPU.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. EMRD.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while CAPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EMRD.L and 0.65% for CAPU.L.