PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) and First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMRD.L is traded in USD, while CAPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CAPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMRD.L achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly higher than CAPS.L's 5.13% return.


EMRD.L

1D
-1.91%
1M
-9.43%
6M
10.42%
YTD
16.13%
1Y
31.48%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
8.78%

CAPS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.58%
6M
1.87%
YTD
5.13%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMRD.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.13%34.18%7.65%9.74%-20.67%-2.26%16.32%
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
5.13%6.85%11.11%7.62%-10.23%-7.56%16.40%

Correlation

The correlation between EMRD.L and CAPS.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020

0.35

The correlation between EMRD.L and CAPS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMRD.L
EMRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EMRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CAPS.L
CAPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) and First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMRD.LCAPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-137.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

78.39

-77.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

0.09

+2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

0.34

+7.30

EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMRD.L and CAPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMRD.L drawdown since its inception was -39.82%, smaller than the maximum CAPS.L drawdown of -99.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRD.L and CAPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMRD.LCAPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.82%

-99.12%

+59.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-99.04%

+86.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-99.04%

+82.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.96%

-99.04%

+64.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.18%

-4.42%

-6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

-18.77%

+4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

25.17%

-21.06%

Volatility

EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that EMRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMRD.LCAPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.25%

3.33%

+5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.93%

7.40%

+12.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

13,939.21%

-13,917.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

6,243.40%

-6,224.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

5,481.36%

-5,461.70%

EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMRD.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPS.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMRD.L vs. CAPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMRD.L nor CAPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMRD.L and CAPS.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMRD.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMRD.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CAPS.L.

EMRD.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CAPS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. EMRD.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while CAPS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EMRD.L and 0.60% for CAPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMRD.L and CAPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer