EMQQ.L vs. FEPG.L
EMQQ.L (EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating) and FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FEPG.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by HANetf. EMQQ.L is passively managed, while FEPG.L is actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMQQ.L charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPG.L.
Performance
EMQQ.L vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ.L achieves a -18.98% return, which is significantly lower than FEPG.L's -4.53% return.
EMQQ.L
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- -18.98%
- 6M
- -20.64%
- 1Y
- -17.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- -11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
FEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- -4.53%
- 6M
- -7.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ.L vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMQQ.L EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating | -18.98% | 1.24% |
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | -4.53% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ.L and FEPG.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ.L vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ.L
FEPG.L
EMQQ.L vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQQ.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQQ.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQQ.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | -0.21 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
EMQQ.L vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -73.83%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -23.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ.L and FEPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.83% | -23.44% | -50.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.58% | -13.04% | -45.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.27% | -9.61% | -28.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.29% | — | — |
Volatility
EMQQ.L vs. FEPG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.04% | 17.30% | +3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.92% | 17.30% | +15.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.41% | 17.30% | +15.11% |
EMQQ.L vs. FEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ.L has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FEPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ.L vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EMQQ.L EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | 0.27% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ.L and FEPG.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEPG.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEPG.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.L.
EMQQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while FEPG.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ.L and 0.65% for FEPG.L.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ.L and FEPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer