PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ.DE achieves a -18.13% return, which is significantly lower than ZPDT.DE's 24.09% return.


EMQQ.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
-18.13%
6M
-20.20%
1Y
-18.34%
3Y*
2.44%
5Y*
-10.68%
10Y*

ZPDT.DE

1D
-2.28%
1M
13.81%
YTD
24.09%
6M
23.15%
1Y
49.52%
3Y*
26.33%
5Y*
22.38%
10Y*
24.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMQQ.DE
HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF
-18.13%5.41%20.08%1.14%-23.93%-29.20%61.10%35.23%-2.16%
ZPDT.DE
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
24.09%11.31%29.30%52.02%-25.52%47.48%30.46%53.58%-9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ.DE and ZPDT.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2018

0.51

The correlation between EMQQ.DE and ZPDT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ.DE
EMQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EMQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDT.DE
ZPDT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQQ.DEZPDT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.39

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

3.19

-3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

8.35

-9.56

EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ.DE and ZPDT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQQ.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

2.43

-3.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

0.99

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.03

-0.95

Drawdowns

EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, which is greater than ZPDT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ.DE and ZPDT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQ.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.94%

-31.48%

-36.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.95%

-15.47%

-13.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.95%

-29.50%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.73%

-29.50%

-30.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.76%

-3.09%

-53.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.78%

-5.68%

-30.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.16%

5.91%

+9.25%

Volatility

EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE) have volatilities of 6.84% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQQ.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

7.06%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

14.78%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

20.30%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.98%

22.33%

+8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.78%

21.38%

+9.40%

EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ.DE has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQQ.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMQQ.DE nor ZPDT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQQ.DE and ZPDT.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDT.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDT.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.DE.

EMQQ.DE tracks EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce, while ZPDT.DE tracks S&P Technology Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ.DE and 0.15% for ZPDT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQQ.DE and ZPDT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer