PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQIX vs. PDEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQIX vs. PDEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQIX achieves a 24.25% return, which is significantly lower than PDEZX's 34.32% return.


EMQIX

1D
1.51%
1M
9.61%
YTD
24.25%
6M
29.10%
1Y
50.78%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*

PDEZX

1D
0.04%
1M
4.26%
YTD
34.32%
6M
35.36%
1Y
49.85%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQIX vs. PDEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMQIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund
24.25%32.62%10.11%5.11%-24.36%-3.93%15.57%24.50%-13.19%38.29%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
34.32%14.88%18.48%16.12%-41.65%-0.86%72.88%30.33%-18.26%40.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQIX and PDEZX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016

0.80

The correlation between EMQIX and PDEZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQIX vs. PDEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQIX
EMQIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PDEZX
PDEZX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PDEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PDEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQIX vs. PDEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQIXPDEZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.39

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

3.64

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

12.51

+0.97

EMQIX vs. PDEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the PDEZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQIX and PDEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQIXPDEZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

2.15

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.11

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.41

+0.05

Drawdowns

EMQIX vs. PDEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQIX drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, smaller than the maximum PDEZX drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQIX and PDEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQIXPDEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.93%

-54.95%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-13.94%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-21.92%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.45%

-52.88%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.12%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.78%

-20.23%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

4.04%

-0.25%

Volatility

EMQIX vs. PDEZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) is 7.15%, while PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that EMQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQIXPDEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.15%

9.45%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

19.85%

-5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

23.62%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

23.56%

-5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

22.25%

-2.78%

EMQIX vs. PDEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PDEZX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQIX vs. PDEZX - Dividend Comparison

EMQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than PDEZX's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EMQIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund
4.24%5.27%2.49%1.73%0.69%35.77%0.73%1.31%11.37%9.50%0.08%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
1.64%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQIX and PDEZX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDEZX has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to EMQIX (7.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQIX dropped -42.93% vs PDEZX's -54.95%.

EMQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQIX and PDEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer