EMQIX vs. GTDDX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EMQIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund) and GTDDX (Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, EMQIX returned 3.47%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for GTDDX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMQIX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for GTDDX.

Performance

EMQIX vs. GTDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQIX achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly lower than GTDDX's 40.06% return.

EMQIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 6.27%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: —

GTDDX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -1.75%
• 6M: 34.08%
• YTD: 40.06%
• 1Y: 61.15%
• 3Y*: 21.56%
• 5Y*: 8.45%
• 10Y*: 9.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQIX vs. GTDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMQIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund	13.16%	32.62%	10.11%	5.11%	-24.36%	-3.93%	15.57%	24.50%	-13.19%	38.29%
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd	40.06%	29.88%	-0.66%	8.82%	-17.70%	-7.00%	17.19%	29.99%	-18.77%	30.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQIX and GTDDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2016	0.86

The correlation between EMQIX and GTDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMQIX vs. GTDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQIX

EMQIX Risk / Return Rank: 46
EMQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
EMQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EMQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
EMQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
EMQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

GTDDX

GTDDX Risk / Return Rank: 91
GTDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GTDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GTDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GTDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQIX vs. GTDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMQIX	GTDDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	2.74	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.33	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.50	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	4.27	-2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.58	15.25	-8.67

EMQIX vs. GTDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the GTDDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQIX and GTDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMQIX vs. GTDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQIX drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, smaller than the maximum GTDDX drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQIX and GTDDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMQIX	GTDDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.93%	-62.89%	+19.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.45%	-14.49%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.88%	-16.08%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.60%	-34.92%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.93%	-6.60%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.72%	-18.70%	+2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	4.04%	+0.28%

Volatility

EMQIX vs. GTDDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) is 8.31%, while Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) has a volatility of 10.88%. This indicates that EMQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMQIX	GTDDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.31%	10.88%	-2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.00%	20.71%	-4.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.27%	22.62%	-4.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.14%	17.23%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.55%	17.24%	+2.31%

EMQIX vs. GTDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than GTDDX's 1.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMQIX vs. GTDDX - Dividend Comparison

EMQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than GTDDX's 15.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMQIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund	4.24%	5.27%	2.49%	1.73%	0.69%	35.77%	0.73%	1.31%	11.37%	9.50%	0.08%	0.00%
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd	15.08%	21.13%	1.16%	1.51%	1.17%	4.46%	5.05%	1.49%	1.53%	0.71%	0.86%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMQIX and GTDDX in my portfolio?

EMQIX and GTDDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMQIX or GTDDX?

GTDDX has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to EMQIX (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQIX dropped -42.93% vs GTDDX's -62.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.