EMQIX vs. CEMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX).
EMQIX is managed by Ashmore. It was launched on Oct 31, 2016. CEMFX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012.
Performance
EMQIX vs. CEMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMQIX vs. CEMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund | -0.82% | 32.62% | 10.11% | 5.11% | -24.36% | -3.93% | 15.57% | 24.50% | -13.19% | 38.29% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 6.79% | 31.39% | 9.51% | 26.45% | -16.15% | 6.74% | 8.70% | 19.75% | -16.90% | 29.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQIX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than CEMFX's 6.79% return.
EMQIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -12.43%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 2.83%
- 1Y
- 26.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMFX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -11.79%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 38.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMQIX vs. CEMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMQIX vs. CEMFX — Risk / Return Rank
EMQIX
CEMFX
EMQIX vs. CEMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 2.25 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 2.86 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.43 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 2.87 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 10.73 | -4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.25 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.76 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.46 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQIX and CEMFX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMQIX vs. CEMFX - Dividend Comparison
EMQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, more than CEMFX's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund | 5.32% | 5.27% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 0.69% | 35.77% | 0.73% | 1.31% | 11.37% | 9.50% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 2.03% | 1.72% | 3.31% | 4.68% | 1.26% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 4.16% | 2.26% | 3.59% | 3.65% | 4.60% |
Drawdowns
EMQIX vs. CEMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQIX drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, which is greater than CEMFX's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQIX and CEMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.93% | -39.30% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -12.41% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.57% | -28.13% | -12.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.45% | -12.41% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -9.69% | -6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.33% | +0.20% |
Volatility
EMQIX vs. CEMFX - Volatility Comparison
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) have volatilities of 7.21% and 6.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMQIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 6.95% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 12.42% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 16.42% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 14.09% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 14.92% | +4.47% |