PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMOIX vs. NJTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMOIX vs. NJTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund (EMOIX) and T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMOIX achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than NJTFX's 1.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EMOIX having a 2.58% annualized return and NJTFX not far behind at 2.49%.


EMOIX

1D
0.26%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.65%
1Y
9.10%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.58%

NJTFX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.72%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMOIX vs. NJTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMOIX
Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund
2.17%6.01%4.17%5.37%-9.57%2.79%4.28%7.17%1.30%6.17%
NJTFX
T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund
1.94%5.00%4.01%7.17%-10.24%2.67%4.73%6.65%1.31%5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EMOIX and NJTFX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.87

The correlation between EMOIX and NJTFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMOIX vs. NJTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMOIX
EMOIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EMOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

NJTFX
NJTFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NJTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NJTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMOIX vs. NJTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund (EMOIX) and T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMOIXNJTFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.95

3.50

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.81

5.65

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.92

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.64

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.84

13.78

-2.94

EMOIX vs. NJTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMOIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the NJTFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMOIX and NJTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMOIXNJTFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

3.50

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.40

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.64

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.27

-0.43

Drawdowns

EMOIX vs. NJTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMOIX drawdown since its inception was -14.20%, smaller than the maximum NJTFX drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMOIX and NJTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMOIXNJTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.20%

-15.19%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-2.59%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.98%

-5.69%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.20%

-15.19%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.20%

-15.19%

+0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.01%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-1.81%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.68%

+0.14%

Volatility

EMOIX vs. NJTFX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund (EMOIX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX) at 1.06%. This indicates that EMOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NJTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMOIXNJTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.06%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.26%

1.98%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04%

2.72%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.99%

3.99%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.08%

3.87%

+0.21%

EMOIX vs. NJTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMOIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than NJTFX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMOIX vs. NJTFX - Dividend Comparison

EMOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than NJTFX's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMOIX
Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund
3.50%4.41%4.09%2.49%2.66%3.27%2.36%2.76%2.54%2.22%2.50%2.03%
NJTFX
T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund
4.45%4.44%4.27%3.27%2.03%2.56%2.79%2.84%3.13%3.13%3.26%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMOIX and NJTFX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMOIX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to NJTFX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMOIX dropped -14.20% vs NJTFX's -15.19%.

NJTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMOIX and NJTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer