EMOIX vs. FMBIX
EMOIX (Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund) and FMBIX (Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMOIX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FMBIX.
Performance
EMOIX vs. FMBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EMOIX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- 9.10%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
FMBIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMOIX vs. FMBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMOIX Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund | 2.17% | 6.01% | 4.17% | 5.37% | -9.57% | 2.79% | 4.28% | 2.13% |
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 5.89% | -10.00% | 1.14% | 3.10% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMOIX and FMBIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EMOIX and FMBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMOIX vs. FMBIX — Risk / Return Rank
EMOIX
FMBIX
EMOIX vs. FMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund (EMOIX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMOIX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMOIX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EMOIX vs. FMBIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMOIX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | — | — |
Volatility
EMOIX vs. FMBIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMOIX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.08% | — | — |
EMOIX vs. FMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMOIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBIX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMOIX vs. FMBIX - Dividend Comparison
EMOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, while FMBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMOIX Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities Fund | 3.50% | 4.41% | 4.09% | 2.49% | 2.66% | 3.27% | 2.36% | 2.76% | 2.54% | 2.22% | 2.50% | 2.03% |
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.60% | 2.29% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMOIX and FMBIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EMOIX and FMBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer