PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) and iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMNE.DE achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH.L's 1.29% return.


EMNE.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.09%
6M
8.22%
YTD
9.92%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.44%

HIGH.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
6M
1.45%
YTD
1.29%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMNE.DE
iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
9.92%22.18%9.86%18.79%-12.35%22.75%1.44%16.09%
HIGH.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
1.29%4.89%5.70%11.59%-9.32%2.82%1.10%5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EMNE.DE and HIGH.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.57

The correlation between EMNE.DE and HIGH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNE.DE
EMNE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EMNE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

HIGH.L
HIGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) and iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMNE.DEHIGH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.08

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.34

4.35

+1.99

EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNE.DE and HIGH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than HIGH.L's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNE.DE and HIGH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMNE.DEHIGH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-25.42%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-2.88%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-3.65%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.70%

-14.64%

-10.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-0.47%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-2.68%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

0.71%

+2.25%

Volatility

EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) at 0.73%. This indicates that EMNE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMNE.DEHIGH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

0.73%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.63%

3.12%

+9.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

3.67%

+11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

5.47%

+10.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

7.16%

+12.82%

EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMNE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HIGH.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMNE.DE vs. HIGH.L - Dividend Comparison

EMNE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, while HIGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMNE.DE
iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.39%2.61%2.95%3.17%3.34%2.40%1.85%2.67%
HIGH.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMNE.DE and HIGH.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMNE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMNE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIGH.L.

EMNE.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while HIGH.L is European High Yield Bonds. EMNE.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while HIGH.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EMNE.DE and 0.50% for HIGH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMNE.DE and HIGH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer